People insist on still commenting on that Zelda post and all the while with things that, to me, just don’t make sense. Everyone wants to keep saying split timeline, and I’ve been willing to let it go, but it’s been almost a year now. So OK.
This for me is more of an argument for theories on time travel and less on Zelda. But first I must add the disclaimer that time travel is only a theory. Because it has not yet happened, it therefore must be considered not possible. I know this may really upset some people, but if you really want to start barking that time travel is possible, you must first show me physical evidence. Send Einstien one minute into the future or something like that. Otherwise don’t even bother.
Let’s break down this split time line.
As adults, Zelda sends Link back into the past before the two of them met as children. Link, as a child, warns Zelda of Ganondorf’s plans. The two of them are able to warn the King and this is how Ganondorf is brought to justice and stopped from taking over Hyrule as he did in Ocarina of Time. This is what leads people to see as two separate time lines.
The first time line being the Hyrule that adult Link was sent away from. Where Ganondorf has been banished to the Dark Realm and Link no longer exists because he was sent back in time.
The second being the Hyrule where child Link has helped stopped Ganondorf before he can do anything.
The first Hyrule is what leads into games such as Twilight Princess, A Link to the Past, and The original Legend of Zelda.
The second Hyrule leads into Wind Waker (which is why the opening legend speaks of a hero who did not return because that was Link after he was sent away).
I get all that. I really do. But just because Nintendo wants to say this is how they envisioned it, doesn’t mean I am going to sit here and buy it. Like I said, this is an argument for time travel theory. Not the game itself.
Even though I said time travel is not possible, there is still common sense to be had.
Adult Zelda sends Link back in time before the two of them met as children. Well wouldn’t this mean that there are now TWO child Links? The one was was sent back and now the one who has yet to even embark on his journey? Where did the second one go? How come he has vanished? Shouldn’t he be showing up to the castle soon with the Kokiri Emerald?
Plus, sending adult Link back in time does not split the time stream. It destroys one. Think about it. Link goes back in time, warns child Zelda of Ganondorf, he gets imprisioned, which means that adult Link doesn’t need to stop him in the future, so they don’t fight, so Zelda doesn’t send him back in time, which means child Link doesn’t warn Zelda so…..what? You know what that is called? A time paradox. A contradiction in the series of events that have led us to where we are.
One person commented using Back to the Future as a reference. Well that reference was a foolish one. When Biff gives himsels the Sports Almanac he then changes his entire future. Remember when old Biff returns from the past? He is in a lot of pain and stumbles away from teh time machine. Well it was a deleted scene, but that part continues on and we see old Biff get erased from existence. He changed his past, which altered the futured, thus destroying his ability to live. When Marty and Doc go back to 1985, Doc explains that if they go to the future, they would go to an alternate 2015. Why can’t they go back to the 2015 they went to the first time? Because it not longer exists.
Of course there is a paradox there all over again. Old Biff gives himself the book. But then he stops existing. So he doesn’t live to be old. So he can’t give himself the book. So he doesn’t get the book. So he grows old anyway….do he can give himself the book. WHAT?! It’s an endless loop.
My favorite movie on time travel is the 2002 version of The Time Machine. Why? Because it deals with those problems head on and answers them. Alexander wants to save his girlfriend from dying so he builds a time machine to stop it from happening, but she dies anyway. No matter what he does, she keeps on dying. He wants to know why he can’t change the past. He eventually finds out that her death is the only reason he built the time machine. If she doesn’t die, he never builds the machine, thus he never saves her.
It is exactly the same with Zelda. If child Link warns child Zelda of Ganondorf, they never grow up to stop him as adults which means Link doesn’t get sent back in time with the necessary information about Ganondorf in the first place. It’s the same endless loop. It doesn’t make sense.
Nintendo is a video game company. Their number one priority is making a profit. Yes, they have some very creative people and passionate story tellers, but just because they say it, doesn’t automatically make it true. Doesn’t make what I am saying true either, but it is how I choose to view it. It’s my opinion and I am entitled to it.
If you don’t agree, good for you. That’s diveristy for you and it’s a great thing.
I’m out!